3 examples of community monitoring and citizen science programmes that could contribute to tracking progress under the Global Biodiversity Framework

Fishers in the Philippines

A two-and-a-half-year study tracked community monitoring and conservation action in protected areas of the Philippines. It found focus group discussions by members of community monitoring groups, Indigenous People or local villages were particularly effective in mobilising action. Local bylaws established by Indigenous People, villages and municipalities to govern resource use were the focus of 22 per cent of the 156 interventions. The study authors observed that the local bylaws tended to be more effective in changing people’s behaviour than national Philippine laws.

In one example, a community monitoring group reported a decline in fish in a bay. In response, the municipality directed that fishing with hook and line should be allowed, but the use of nets and compressors banned. This was widely respected and after only seven months the abundance of fish in the bay reportedly increased.

This could contribute data and interpretation to the indicator ‘Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels’ under the Global Biodiversity Framework.

Hunters in Finland

In 1988, hunters in Finland developed a programme in cooperation with the Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute to record information on 30 wild animals.

Twice a year 7,000 volunteers, mainly hunters, document which species they see over precisely defined areas, counting tracks in the snow in winter and animal sightings in summer. The programme is an example of how collaborations between hunters and scientists can contribute a wide range of information on the distribution, abundance and structure of wildlife populations.

This could contribute data and interpretation to the headline indicators ‘Benefits from the sustainable use of wild species’ and ‘Services provided by ecosystems’.

Citizen scientists in southern Africa

A lack of information about threatened baboon spiders in southern Africa inspired researchers to set up the Baboon Spider Atlas in 2022. This encourages citizen scientists to upload photos of baboon spiders in the wild to an online database with data about where and when the spiders were seen.

This combination of citizen science and conventional research has allowed researchers to assemble the largest database of information on baboon spiders in southern Africa.

Such programmes could contribute data to the indicator ‘Red List Index’.

A roadmap for increasing citizens’ involvement

The researchers assessed how Indigenous Peoples, local communities and citizen scientists can participate in monitoring each of the 365 indicators that were adopted in December 2022, when the Global Biodiversity Framework was finalised. Two researchers for every indicator sorted them into four groups based on how much citizen input is possible and how autonomous they can be. The categories ranged from the entire monitoring process being undertaken by citizens to all monitoring being carried out by scientists and government organisations. Independent experts with experience of on-the-ground participatory monitoring spot-checked how indicators had been categorised.

Across both developed and developing countries, headline indicators that could benefit from citizen engagement include the monitoring of fish stocks, coastal eutrophication, forest management, Red Lists for species and ecosystems, invasive species, benefits from ecosystems, proportion of human population in traditional occupations, and extent of natural ecosystems. In most cases, citizen-derived data would need to be used in combination with professional scientists’ and governmental statistical organisations’ measurements.

"Traditional knowledge indicators and data collected through community-based monitoring and information systems can help governments gain a fuller picture of biodiversity trends. This analysis highlights opportunities to address data gaps to enhance understanding and reporting on goals and targets of the Global Biodiversity Framework." - Katherine Despot-Belmonte, Senior Specialist in Nature, Gender and Rights at UNEP-WCMC and an author of the study

"Government agencies often have difficulties finding meaningful ways of engaging citizens in biodiversity conservation. There is a need for a ‘road map’ for stepping up citizens’ contributions to halt and reverse global biodiversity loss. This analysis of how government agencies and citizen scientists can collaborate to achieve the targets and goals of the Global Biodiversity Framework is an important first step." - DSc. Finn Danielsen, Co-founder and Ecologist at the Nordic Foundation for Development and Ecology (NORDECO) and lead author of the study

"Monitoring progress towards the Global Biodiversity Framework represents a critical step towards addressing the interconnected nature and climate crises of our time. Engagement across diverse stakeholders provides our best chance to obtain accurate, context-specific information, including for the over 30 per cent of headline indicators in the Framework that require the use of spatial data in their calculation." - Anne Virnig, Strategic Advisor on Science and Policy at UNDP, co-author of the study